Chris Temple On Line

January 6, 2011

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

________________________________________________________________________

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

                        Plaintiff,                                   

 

            vs.                                                                    Case No. 03-CR-126-C-01

 

CHRISTOPHER L. TEMPLE,

 

                        Defendant.

________________________________________________________________________

 

MOTION TO DISMISS

________________________________________________________________________

 

            Christopher L. Temple, (hereinafter "Temple") appearing Pro Se,  representing and speaking for himself at all times as is his right protected under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution, by this Motion moves the Court to DISMISS the pending Probation Violation Petition that has been filed against him.

            As he has amply demonstrated by his two Answers and accompanying documentation/exhibits to them (dated, respectively, December 13, 2010 and December 20, 2010), both of which are made a part of this Motion in their entirety by this reference, there is no meaningful factual basis for the Government's Petition.  Indeed, Temple suggests that the Petition on its face is unreliable, given the Probation officer's clear contradictions of her own allegations as was particularly detailed in his December 20, 2010 Answer.

            Further, by this Motion, Temple also asks to renew his "Motion Under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583(e)(1) Requesting Termination of the Unexpired Term of Supervised Release..."

Page 1 of 2

dated December 13, 2010.  It should be clear to the Court by now that his Probation officer has a decidedly different agenda for some reason than Temple's successfully carrying out his obligations; particularly his financial ones to those dependent on him and to his victims.  In any case, Temple respectfully suggests, this Court's consideration of his earlier Motion is not dependent on the prior approval of the Probation Department under the statute.

            By the Court's allowing the renewal of his Motion and her granting it, Temple can best resume his life, responsibilities and efforts to earn a greater legitimate income and pay his just debts; efforts that have all been and remain severely harmed, most recently by the Probation Department's capricious, unwarranted and unreasonable actions.

 

Dated:  January 6, 2011                                    Respectfully submitted,

                                                                                    /s/

                                                                        Christopher L. Temple

                                                                        1190 Valley Rd.

                                                                        Spooner, WI  54801

 

                                                                        (715) 939-1200

 

                                                                       

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 2